ANALYSIS OF WARFIGHTING FUNCTIONS– THE UKRAINIAN COUNTEROFFENSIVE IN CONTEXT

  • Nenad Taneski Military academy „General Mihailo Apostolski“ – Skopje University „Goce Delcev“ - Stip,
  • Sasha Smileski Military academy „General Mihailo Apostolski“ – Skopje University „Goce Delcev“ - Stip
  • Emil Dimitriev Faculty of Philosophy, „Ss. Cyril and Methodius“ University in Skopje
Keywords: Ukrainian forces,warfighting functions, service support, analysis

Abstract

This paper provides a detailed analysis ofwarfighting functions during the counteroffensive of the Ukrainian forces against Russian forces, as well as the efficiencyof warfighting
functions, which has a significant impact on the results of the war. It will cover the period
from the start of the counter-offensive of the Ukrainian forces, from June 2023, when some
victories were recorded by the Ukrainian forces.
Through the analysis and processing of confidential and already available information from
social networks, media and the Washington Post, and in accordance with the comparison
with the US doctrine, a special emphasis was placed on one of the warfighting functions in
Ukrainian counter-offensive, that is, the system for combat service support.The method of
analyses and synthesis was used to summarize the results and arrive at the conclusion.
Hence it is confirmed that in terms of the organization and implementation of the combat
service support warfighting function, the Ukrainian forces have failed to meet the right
requirements in the right place and at the right time. The main culprit in all of this is the lack
of sufficient time for preparation and training of personnel for different models of the same
type of assets that were donated by Western countries during the war, as well as the rejection
of US military officials’ advice to use frontal attack along one axis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2024-12-27
How to Cite
Taneski, N., Smileski, S., & Dimitriev, E. (2024). ANALYSIS OF WARFIGHTING FUNCTIONS– THE UKRAINIAN COUNTEROFFENSIVE IN CONTEXT. Security Dialogues, 15(2), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.47054/10.47054/SD24152121t